Author : Aashi Dixit, Student at Department of Law, School of Legal Studies, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University – Lucknow
Indian social framework is inflexible in nature, it sets aside a great deal of effort for the general public to acknowledge individuals or customs which it doesn’t as a rule consent to. All through India, individuals are positioned by their riches, status and influence. There are normal and influential individuals. The socialists have separated the general public into ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’. We should change with the changing situations and not stick to our unreasonable standards and inflexible perspectives. Changing with the changing occasions is a key to advance. Be that as it may, there are a couple of categories where our considerations and believing are as yet missing behind. Homosexuality will stay a forbidden insofar as individuals are happy to push it away from plain view of conversation and 10% of Indian populace comprises of LGBT individuals and the proposal is that government should pass a legislation for marriage of LGBT individuals and the government needs to take therapeutic activities for them in any case if any member of the community experiences struggle and bullying from anyone else. Transgenders are the people having a place with LGBT people group abd they are individuals who battle for opportunity and for equivalent citizenship; the initial step taken by the Judiciary to offer rights to the LGBT individuals was made through the judgment in Naz Foundation case. Today, homosexuality and queer people might be noticeable more to the Indian youth than any other time in recent memory, however inside the limits of family, home and school, acknowledgment of their sexuality and opportunity to easily communicate their sexual decisions despite everything stay a difficult battle for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) individuals.
In urban India, where web based life and corporate activities have made expanding attention to LGBT rights, the situation looks more optimistic for gay men than for transgender individuals or lesbian women. While urban LGBT voices that are heard through a few online forums, these being significant piece of LGBT activism, the rural community still suffers. These uncover just a little piece of the different difficulties over looked by the world. Far away from gay pride marches, meet-ups and warmed conversations on Twitter, families in rural India have their own specific manners of handling with LGBT people. In certain parts, mystery killings for the family’s honor are arranged so the only pathway for a gay man to endure is to flee in the night to some city, with no cash. Numerous nations have legitimized same sex marriage since they comprehend the need of having the opportunity to love and the opportunity to wed anyone they love. Everybody should have the privilege to marriage since marriage is about love and not gender. Consistently, an enormous number of LGBT individuals face issues with bullying, joblessness, segregation, destitution and absence of social insurance. There are as yet numerous locations in India where people don’t belive that the LGBT community should have equal rights and shouldn’t be permitted to be a part of the family. Individuals in the LGBT people group are battling for equivalent rights and acknowledgment. Trans individuals, particularly, face a great deal of trouble in discovering acknowledgment. Individuals in the LGBT people group are looked down upon constantly. This is a significant issue since victimization the LGBT people group is extremely common and is a violation of fundamental rights as well as human rights. Individuals’ preferences lead them to believe that LGBT individuals are odd and altogether different. The foundation of marriage in the community is for the most part viewed as stretching out just to male-female connections. Consequently same-sex marriages and relationships are most certainly not legitimately perceived in many nations and thus, homosexual lovers are prevented numerous times from claiming the lawful and monetary benefits naturally gave by conjugal status. These incorporate business benefits, the capacity to record joint government forms and maybe in particular since the approach of AIDS – medical advantages, inheritance etc.
INDIAN SOCIETY’S PURVIEW OF HOMOSEXUALITY:
Confronted with the reality of homosexual unions, civil activists portray various positions. On occasion they basically endure the marvel, at different occasions they advocate legal acknowledgment of such unions and they believe that same sex relationships go through a lot of struggle. In different cases, they favor giving homosexual unions legal proportionality to marriage appropriately purported, alongside the legal chance of receiving adoption. In this manner an expanding number of locales have de-condemned homosexual acts. Numerous people accept that the laws are out of date and ought to be evacuated. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights incorporates right to life, right to protection, right to health and uniformity under the law, just as the privilege to opportunity of representation and opportunity of protection from brutality however the Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people are continually in danger of and are suggested arraignment and it is a gross infringement of their fundamental human rights in various nations. Numerous LGBT people dread of detainment, torment, and manhandle and even homicide, exclusively on the grounds that they live in a setting that doesn’t endure heir sexual direction, sex character or sex representation. In Indian situation this is excessively high, the public, the families and the local laws are totally against those individuals. There are no official reports for the number of individuals in the LGBT community yet the government of India submitted figures to the Supreme Court in 2012, as indicated by which, there were about 2.5 million gay individuals recorded in the nation. These figures are just founded on those people who have self announced to the Ministry of Health. Homophobia is widely prevalent in the nation and sexuality isn’t talked about freely. Section 377 is a case of how the Indian culture has tormented the LGBT people group since hundreds of years. The Indian Penal code (IPC), going back to 1860 makes sexual activities “against the order of nature” deserving of law and conveys a lifelong incarceration. While urban LGBT voices that are heard through a few on the internet and through social media structure a significant piece of LGBT activism, these uncover just a little piece of the difficulties endured. Reports of assaults, torment and beatings of individuals from the LGBT people group are normal in India. They face obliviousness from their families and are compelled to wed against their decisions. In different parts, lesbian women are exposed to family-agreed rehabilitative assaults, which are regularly done by their own relatives. However, the LGBT people group has never lost hope; they have constantly attempted to make the best out of each circumstance. They have been effective in sorting out different pride marches everywhere throughout the nation.
The Preamble to the Constitution of India commands Justice – social, economic, and political, equality of status. The Constitution gives each individual an equal status before the law and an equivalent safety of laws inside the boundaries of India. The word ‘any person’ here means each person, without any discrimination based on caste, creed, religion, sex, and so forth. A transgender in India is incorporated inside the words “any person” furthermore, is given equivalent status to that of each straight individual in India. The transgender community can’t be segregated on the ground of non-implementation of any of the laws inside the country by reason of their disparities and isolating them dependent on any discretionary class. The catchphrase concerning the assurance of Transgender is the word sex. The articulation sex isn’t simply constrained to natural sex of male or female, however planned to incorporate individuals who believe themselves to be neither male or female. Articles 15(2) and 16(4) has likewise been deciphered to give social balance to these networks, for example, balance in open business, it gives that the states will have the capacity to make any uncommon arrangement for the improvement of these powerless minority who are presently included inside the classification of socially backward classes. These Articles read with the Directive Principles of State Policy and different universal instruments to which India is a part of, call for social balance, which the transgender could understand, just if offices and openings are reached out to them so they can likewise live with respect what’s more, equivalent status with different sexes. The option to pick one’s own identity is one of the most basic right under Article 21, right to live with dignity, this viewpoint is secured and ensured by this Article as it symbolizes the most significant right being a human, an option to live, which the State is required to shield from infringement. The transgender people reserve an option to free life which is one of the most significant parts of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Transgender in our general public have not been seen with respect, they are regularly mortified and seen as a negative personality by the general public, their worth in the society has been weakened. Different brutal acts, for example, human trafficking and beggary are proclaimed as an offense and culpable as indicated by law. The extent of Article 23 of the Constitution of India is wide as it incorporates inside any type of segregation which is prohibited.
JOURNEY OF SECTION 377
The Indian Penal code (IPC), going back to 1860 makes sexual activities “against the order of nature” culpable by law and conveys a lifelong incarceration. “Unnatural sex” is whatever is against what the law considers to be “natural sex,” with “natural sex” being between a man and a woman and of the penile-vaginal assortment. This clearly oppresses different types of sexual representation between consenting adults, particularly among India’s sexual minorities. Section 377 condemns sexual articulation of grown-ups having a place with the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people group, yet for the most part, it additionally penalizes non-penile-vaginal sex between heterosexual-distinguishing grown-ups. This abusive section of Indian law is in actuality a heritage, given to India by the British. It is obviously no longer prevalent in Britain itself; however India had decided not to remove this disrespectful law. This law was struck somewhere around the 2009 Delhi High Court judgement, Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi, which pronounced Section 377 and other lawful forbiddances against same-sex lead to be in direct infringement of fundamental rights given by the Indian Constitution. Prior the Supreme Court has asked the counter gay rights gatherings, moving sanctioning of gay sex to clarify how such acts are against the order of nature as submitted to them. This noteworthy order came following an eight-year-long fight in court which started with Naz Foundation’s appeal in 2001 to scrap this section of the law. However, in December 2013, Supreme Court upheld the law that condemns gay sex, in a decision that turns around a milestone 2009 Delhi High Court order which had recently decriminalized gay acts. The court said it was up to the parliament to legislate on this matter. The fights against the reinstitution of Section 377 occurred across India, and brought about political activism across political to pronounce their help for the law’s annulment. Since 2014, transgender individuals in India have been permitted to change their sexual orientation without sex reassignment medical procedure, and can register themselves under a third sex. Over the previous decade, the LGBT people group has increased increasingly in India, particularly in huge urban communities. In the ongoing years, mentality towards homosexuality has grown somewhat. Specifically, the Indian media and Bollywood have been very open and steady. A few associations, including the Naz Foundation Trust, The National Aids Control Organization, Law commission of India have additionally communicated their help for the people
In January 2018, Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra got out an old 2016 order and listed it for January 8. This appeal was Navtej Singh Johar and others versus Union of India. This request was recorded in 2016, after the Supreme Court re-condemned Section 377, which had prior been de-criminalised by the Delhi high court. There were five applicants, each of the five are notable and openly gay experts from the field of dance, news coverage, and business – Navtej Singh Johar, Sunil Mehra, Ritu Dalmia, Aman Nath and Ayesha Kapur. They chose to state openly that their own sexual rights are influenced by Section 377. The 2016 request was labeled with another 2016 appeal, Akkai Padmashali versus Union of India. This subsequent one relates to the privileges of transgender persons.
On Sixth September 2018, we won a long, hard fight when the Supreme Court gave a decision which expressed that Section 377 is unlawful as it encroached on the essential privileges of autonomy, closeness and expression, in this way sanctioning homosexuality in India. The court expressly toppled its 2013 judgment; #LoveWins. Senior Advocate Indu Malhotra expressed that, history owes a conciliatory sentiment to the individuals from the LGBT people group and their families for the deferral in giving redressal to the “shame” and “segregation” they have looked as the centuries progressed.
LIFE AFTER SECTION 377
The LGBTQ community had always faced discrimination, whether it was at school, colleges or their workplace. The society had never really accepted them and they always had a sense of separation from the rest of the society. As a part of the society, it was never really easy for parents to accept their child if he/she was a part of the LGBTQ community because of the pressure they faced from the world. But as time progressed, views changed and people changed, now even though coming out of the closet is still not easy but there is some hope that the family will understand enough to not kick the child out of the house, into the streets. But even with this, Section 377 was always a burden; it was a law that made the love between the LGBT communities, a crime. The society had progressed and had started understanding that love between a woman and a man is not the only kind of love there is but with the shadow of Section 377, their love was still a crime.
After Section 377 was decriminalized by the Supreme Court, the community rejoiced and for the first time in many years, they felt that their love mattered too and that was the start of a new era. Some felt better prepared to fight the day by day difficulties they endured at schools, universities or work.. People all over the county have started showing support for homosexuals and their attitude towards the love between them has also changed. All over social media, the citizens expressed their joy and happiness after the scrapping of Section 377. It was not only the LGBT community that was happy, but the whole nation celebrated. Various pride parades have been organized in almost all the cities of the county to show support for homosexuals. An equal arrangement of feelings accepts that we can develop a genuine change in our general public by regulating social movements at our work environments, so individuals don’t feel left out. Sharing anecdotes about sexuality and sex at work environment is extreme, however making a domain where LGBT community has a sense of security and are regarded and treated with compassion must be recognized as a key objective by all associations. This requires having set up arrangements that are prejudiced of misuse, separation, and abuse. Implementing them effectively frequently includes a mix of preparing, and mindfulness. An approach to accomplish this is by facilitating connections with LGBT gatherings and having an emotionally supportive network set up inside the association. Similarly as what works best for women or tending to women’s interests at the work environment implies having them start to lead the pack, likewise, straight (hetero) people can’t be required to completely comprehend the profundity of LGBT concerns.
Also, there ought to be no acknowledgment of conduct in the working environment that can be viewed as immediate or circuitous abuse/bullying This is the place the HR offices and the organization strategies come without hesitation; they have to settle on sure that the policies isn’t dependant on the sex or the character of the individual. Corporates have gotten on board with the idea of providing a safer environment. Independent of whether they are originating from an absolutely business viewpoint, there are more associations who are either straightforwardly supporting gay rights in their own working environments or paying for occasions and promoting and supporting causes, for example, the pride walk, etc. For gay men, coercing was constantly a reason to be scared. Presently post-judgment, there is much more discussion that should be done. Drafting a LGBT-friendly arrangement just signifies progressing endeavors to make working environments in India progressively comprehensive, safe, and badgering free. As we understand, changing the relevant law is just an apparatus to advance social change; the doing or fixing of it lies in the hands of individuals.
Indians are not oblivious to the members of the LGBT community but rather they don’t hesitate to talk about reservation of homosexuality and the outlook of Indian individuals despite everything remains. The younger generation understands the emotions of LGBT individuals however not the old age individuals. Because homosexuality isn’t broadly rehearsed in India doesn’t mean it isn’t typical. Because it isn’t basic doesn’t mean it ought to be denounced. India is a developing nation and what will help the development are individuals that are happy to push it away from plain view of blankness. Homosexuality is certainly not a psychological ailment. It is as normal as hetero. Any human has no control of it.
The condition of LGBT people is most exceedingly terrible in India. They are exposed to provocation, brutality, and abuse. European nations have secured the sexual privileges of the individuals from the LGBT people group. The goals passed by UN have made a positive effect everywhere throughout the world. It is critical to make individuals mindful of the difficulties of LGBT people group. Human rights are characteristic rights which are indestructible and unavoidable that is given upon man since birth. Gay people are not outsiders, they are not wiped out, and their sexual conduct is natural. The Government of India should wipe away its preservationist nature and make solid strides for the government assistance of sexual minority. A solitary judgment seriously influenced the privileges of the whole network making tremendous harm to confidence and self respect of the LGBT people group. Just and reasonable battle for social acknowledgment by LGBT will go on. The world will advance and one day, it would enlighten the thinking.
The judiciary restored our faith in humanity and paved a way for the acceptance of those not accepted by the society. The judgment was revolutionary but now it is up to us as a society to influence change in the thinking of the people. Any number of laws and judgments will be futile, if we don’t change the way we think and perceive the LGBT community. Coming out as LGBTQ+ is never easy, even in societies that are supportive and protective of the community’s rights. The process begins with accepting oneself, followed by asserting that identity to the world. Judicial reform may create an enabling platform to come out, but social realities don’t necessarily change in sync. So the battle must be fought as much inside courtrooms, as inside drawing rooms, classrooms and meeting rooms, every day of our lives.
 Naz Foundation vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi, WP(C) No.7455/2001
 Countries where homosexuality is legalized :
Greece, Green land, Guadeloupe, Gautemala, Guinea, Bissau, Haiti, Honduras, Hongkong, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Isreal, Italy, Ivory Coast,Montengro, Albania, Andoraa, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Austria,Ajerbarjan, Bahamos, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil (no Sodomy law for
military person), Bulgaria, Burkina faso Cambodia, Central African Republic Chad, Chile, China, Columbia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba (Article 303a of the penal code punishes ‘publicly manifested homosexuality), Cyprus ( Ban on military on health ground), Czech Republic, Denmark (homosexuals equivalent to heterosexuals), Dominican Republic, Dutch Antilles, Equador, Elsavadore, Eritrea, Estonia, Falfland Islands, Farse Islands,
Finland, France, French Guyana, French Polynesia, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Japan, Jordon, lazakhstan, Kosova, Kyrgyzatan, Latvia, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, Lithunia, Luxembourg, Macau, Macedonia, Madagasca, Malia, Martimqua, Mexico, Moldora, Monaco, Netherland, Netherland Antilles, New Caledonia, Newzealand, Niger, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, reunion, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, San Marino, Soa Tome and Principe, Serbia, Sierraleone, Slovenia, , South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, USA , Uruga, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Vojvodina, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Vojvodina.
 A relationship not established on consanguinity or marriage isn’t entitled for Social Security benefits under Employee Provident Fund Act, Pension Act, Workmen Compensation Act, Insurance Act, Housing Act etc.
 Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
 BBC News. (2012, March 14). India has 2.5m gays, court told. Retrieved February 21, 2020, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-17363200
 Indian Penal Code 1860, Section 377
 Indian Constitution 1950
 Article 14, Indian Constitution 1950
 Ibid Article 15(2)
 Ibid Article 16(4)
 Supra 7
 Constitution of India, 1950
 Indian Penal Code 1860
 WP(C) No.7455/2001
 Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr vs Naz Foundation & Ors
 Writ petition (criminal) no. 76 of 2016
 Staff, T. W. (n.d.). Supreme Court Scraps Section 377; “Majoritarian Views Cannot Dictate Rights,” Says CJI. Retrieved July 25, 2020, from https://thewire.in/law/supreme-court-scraps-section-377-majoritarian-views-cannot-dictate-rights-says-cji
 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.572/2016
 Supra 8
 The Economic Times. (2018). History owes apology to LGBT community and kin: Justice Indu Malhotra. [online] Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/history-owes-apology-to-lgbt-community-and-kin-justice-indu-malhotra/articleshow/65708442.cms?from=mdr [Accessed 23rd July. 2020].
 Ghoshal, S. (2018, December 15). Life after Section 377. Retrieved July 24, 2020, from https://www.livemint.com/Leisure/o5TVfO7DY1vrs75aY94BTP/Life-after-Section-377.html