Posted on: April 30, 2021 Posted by: admin Comments: 0

Author: Garvit Ramchandran, Student at Babu Banarsi Das University, Lucknow.

Co-Author: Yash Pandey, Student at Shambhunath Institute of Law, Doctor Rajendra Singh University, Prayagraj.



Mediation is a process in which the disputing parties discuss their disputes in an informal meeting or a scheduled settlement conference with the assistance of a trained and experienced third person who helps them to research a settlement”

Mediation could be a powerfully organized deliberate debate goal strategy where an outsider assists the gatherings with settling the contentions between them by arrangement, settlement, particular correspondence, and negotiating techniques. These techniques are successively designed in an exceedingly manner that facilitates the method of mediation and dispute resolution. The thought of mediation has evolved within the latter half of the twentieth century, however, the roots of mediation will be copied manner back to the traditional Indian legal systems for instance the systems called the “Gram Panchayats” and “Nyaya Panchayats” and, that were common wide current in ancient rural India[1]. Presently, even though the recognition of the council systems could have dwindled, this method still exists in varied elements of rural India, and also the Indian government is creating incessant efforts to revive these autochthonic justice delivery strategies by allocating funds for his or her fresh functioning.[2]

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was the primary statute to introduce the Indian legal system was to mediation. Sub-section of Section thirty of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 encourages the parties concerned to explore the choice of mediation and conciliation despite mediation proceedings having started and thereby empowers the mediation judicature to use mediation as a way of dispute resolution. all the same, because of an absence of correct social control (or even formation) of any specific rules of mediation, this provision promoting mediation has nearly been rendered defunct. This but was corrected to a precise extent by the introduction of Section eighty-nine of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which was involved with the exploration of the various ways of dispute resolution. Also, the notion of “judicial mediation” was initially introduced by this section”[3]. looking forward to this, the Court, wherever happy that the circumstances square measure such the parties will try to settle their disputes amicably in ways if tried, the Court might encourage the parties to hunt out the ways of mediation, arbitration, and different styles of alternate dispute resolution. Despite this, as opposed to an alternate legally perceived way of nonbinding different debate resolutions,  there is still no solid resolution that tends to the need of and guarantees the secrecy of Mediation in India. It was solely recently within the year 2011 that the Supreme Court of Asian country which is India declared that mediation proceedings were confidential, Associate in Nursingd solely a dead settlement agreement or a press release that the mediation proceedings were unsuccessful, should be provided to the court by the mediator[4]. it’s expected that via this judgment, the recognition of mediation as a technique of resolving disputes in an Asian country can increase. Following within the same footsteps, the Law Commission of the Asian country in its 129th Report counseled that it ought to be made obligatory for the Court to refer disputes to mediation for settlement[5]. This was referred to within the landmark case of Afcons below Ltd v. M/S Cherian Varkey Constructions (2010)[6]. Another landmark call by the Supreme Court came across on twenty-second February 2013 within the case of B.S. Krishnamurthy v. B.S. Nagaraj[7], whereby it directed the Family Courts to attempt to settle marital disputes via mediation and to conjointly introduce parties to mediation centers with the consent of the parties, particularly in matters regarding maintenance, kid custody, and the lot. within the few years since mediation centers within the cities of urban center (in the year2005) and Bangalore (in the year 2007) are discovered, around 30,969 cases are through mediation method, and more than 50% of those cases are settled ever since[8]. One of the most renowned recent cases wherever mediation was resorted to was the one wherever conciliation has been rejected by the Reliance bigwigs Mukesh and Anil Dhirubhai Ambani over the takeover of South African telecommunication Major MTN.


In India Mediation is a voluntary process that has been used as a method of dispute resolution to mutually find a perfect solution for their legal problem by appointing a mediator or entering into a written contract, in the industrial dispute act, 1947[9] mediation has first come to be legally recognized as a method of a dispute the resolution. On their agreed-upon terms, the mediator can help them to get to a conclusion base as it is a voluntary process all the rights and powers are recognized by the parties and they can withdraw from the process of mediation without starting a reason at a face it also motivates or encourages the parties to participate in dispute resolution active and directly where they can freely explain the fact of their dispute formulate option or other ways to resolve the dispute and make a final decision by coming settlement one of the primary benefit of mediation in India is that it is a completely private method of the dispute resolution.[10]

When both the parties are present then the mediator will make a formal introduction of both the parties, then the physical setting will be supervised, so that both the parties can feel secure. The issue they see and notice, then confirm all the data of the case if brief have been pre-submitted by some mediator. The opening statement during the introductory remark will set out golden rules for the mediation. All the golden rules help the mediation to move along smoothly. There is also some problem identification, this might be a part of other segments, the common goal to be found by mediator between the parties, then the mediator will find which issue going to be settle or those that will settle first.


Unlike an arbitrator or a judge, the outcome of the case cannot be decided not even by the mediator has to help the dispute to be resolve through a process that encourages the problems of both the parties

  • Identifying the strength and weaknesses of their cases.
  • Agree on an adequate solution
  • Air dispute

For all the parties the primary goal is to work out a solution easily trust and can live with it because there are no authorities given to a mediator to impose a decision unless both the parties agree to it nothing will be decided. The case will be accessed by a mediator and every weakness for each site will be highlighted. Over many years it has been recognized that mediation is the fastest growing method to resolve disputes globally it allows parties to relook at common interests and rights of each other. and come up with an innovative and applicable solution this will help to maintain affectionate relations between both parties. The current scenario of mediation under Section4 industrial dispute Act 1947[11] is allocated with the duty to promote and mediate the settlement of all industrial dispute in detail and prescribe the procedure for conciliation proceeding if it is used properly it’s a cheap and quick process unsuccessfully the matters should be resolve by this provision are still pending in court in a very large number and everyday new matters are filed in the year 2002 and amendment to the court of civil procedure, 1908 ( CPC ) [12]was bought in. Section 89 provide the difference of case in ADR  being pending. Many courts in India have mediation centers, but there is no precise data available to show that this provision had been utilized successfully.

By the ho supreme court of India in April 2005, the mediation and conciliation project committee (MCPC) was established to supervise the successful implementation of mediation. The attempt of MCPC has given a rise to court-annexed mediation and help it in expanding as ‘Another effective note of dispute resolution. Not as an alternative resolution mechanism. It has been observing that most of the high courts have their separate set of rules governing mediation and conciliation. excepting for few high courts, there is no such data available to expose the status of mediation cases refer success/failure of that matter and number of the settlement have been arrived at the effectively implemented the main objective of MCPC was to cut backlog, with an appropriate legal from working more attention is required towards farming of a national policy. As we all know dispute is the most common part of everyone’s life, There is 3 aspect of every dispute people, processes, and problems. What is most important in a dispute that how the parties can handle the dispute, there can be two modes of retaining a dispute adversarial like litigation, arbitration, and non-adversarial like mediation and conciliation. It is accurate that all matters cannot be mediated, But some matters can be mediated comprise of, but are not limited to, the commercial, contractual dispute, consumer matter, and all those tortious liabilities which are involved. Current jurisprudence of mediation the mediation concept is very deep and ancient from the time of Lord Krishna mediating between Kauravs and Pandavas in the Mahabharat, to the family elder were resolving all the domestic issues, to the settlement of the dispute at the community level through Panchayats, there exists a strong culture of mediation India. As time passing, certain statutes provide for mediation as the mode of resolution of a dispute between the parties.


Section 89[13] of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) provides for ADR strategies to settle the disputes unfinished before the courts. Under Section 89, CPC, consent of the parties is necessary for referring a case for arbitration within the absence of Associate in Nursing arbitration agreement and conciliation. However, for respect to judicial settlement, Lok Adalat, or mediation, consent of the parties is not necessary. The referral choose can refer compulsory.[14] The justification for the mandatory nature of reference is that the absence of consent for reference doesn’t affect the voluntary nature of the mediation method because the parties still retain the liberty to agree or to not agree for settlement throughout the mediation. The referral court ought to apply its judicial mind objectively to establish the factors facilitating a triple-crown mediation by mistreatment of his judicial experience.3 Generally, the reluctance for mediation by the parties at the initial stage of the litigation is because of the rationale that they are doing not need to settle the dispute together with his rival UN agency dragged him to the legal proceeding. another excuse is a terror that the opposite party may consider his readiness for mediation as a weakness of his case4. However, necessary mediation provides a platform for the parties to consider another possibility for the settlement of their disputes.

  • Greater management. Mediation will increase the management the parties have over the resolution. every party area unit is directly concerned with negotiating their agreement and no settlement may be obligatory upon you[15]. as compared, discontent is commonly knowledgeable in court wherever parties have very little alternative however to just accept the judgment created, that they’ll not be proud of.
  • It’s confidential. not like the potential promotional material of court proceedings, everything aforesaid at the mediation is entirely confidential to the parties (unless specifically united otherwise).
  • It’s voluntary. Any party could withdraw at any time.
  • The mediation is organized at a venue convenient to the parties, UN agency every have their area yet as a separate area for joint conferences. The intercessor listens to everyone’s read, talks to the parties in private and along, guiding them towards a settlement.
  • Reduced prices. typically the value is greatly reduced as compared with attempting to settle the matter through court. an ancient judicial proceeding is extremely dearly won and therefore the total value is very unpredictable.
  • Faster outcome. as a result of mediation may be used early in an exceeding dispute, associate degree agreement will sometimes be reached faster than if following through the courts.
  • Support. Mediators area unit trained in operating with troublesome things. The intercessor acts as a neutral help and supports every party through the method.
  • Preservation of Relationships. whether or not it is also a business or family dispute, preservation of relationships may be a key advantage of mediation. Mediation helps participants concentrate on effectively act with one another as critical assaultive one another.

Lack of confidence- The apex code in Mr.Krishnamurthi V. New India Association[16] .pointed out the urgent need for uniform legislation for mediation all over India. In advancement to this, the hon’ble court set up a community to draft legislation and come up with helping conferring legal sanctity to dispute settlement by mediation.Such legislation directly aims at making mediation a mandatory exercise before approaching court or tribunals. The economic implementation of a system like this can most undoubtedly facilitate addressing the problems associated with the court delivery system. Such a system would additionally profit the common man during a substantial means. However, even within the gift day, Indian lawyers still be as ancient and conservative as they need been over a few years. They hardly tend to support any new changes and hesitate whereas venturing into whereas at constant time, exposing their business to the unknown risks which will be concerned in associate degree ADR or mediation method, about that they’re not cognizant. Also, Indian lawyers continually worry that delving into mediation would doubtless deprive them of financial gain by encouraging the settlement of cases untimely and thereby considerably reducing the legal fees that might rather be earned throughout the ongoing and prolonged judicial proceedings. On, the opposite hand the adversarial system (current court system) too can not be all distributed with. The adversarial system (involving judicial proceeding proceedings within the courts) is commonly the foremost relevant method during many alternative forms of things particularly, those needing authoritative interpretation or institution of rights or that manifest severe negotiating imbalance. It is also needed collectively of the last resorts of dispute resolution. However, its haphazard and unchanging application across a large vary of conflict-ridden things could be a major reason for the many maladies military blockade the Indian system.  It has been detected that up until currently principally corporations and establishments within the field of insurance, banking, and commerce have relied on mediation and ADR as suggests that of sinking disputes. Hence, encouragement for creating necessary provisions for creating ADR especially mediation to be used as unremarkably sorted when suggests that dispute resolution is way needed. Awareness needs to be aimed toward the people with a wide promotion in numerous media. Thus, there’s associate degree pressing ought to establish folks or community-based mostly initiatives that already exist within the community for seizing the reason for spreading awareness concerning mediation across the country. It currently appears that we want new ways in which of observing conflict resolution and also the profession and hope that we tend to discover a replacement means that may facilitate in bridging bonds between the ethics of following, the values of the law, and also the demands of public policy. serving to the shift from adversarial judicial proceeding to ways of alternate dispute resolution like mediation, making awareness in society of the advantages of the mediation process, developing capacities area unit vital components so within the success of the method.


The ideas of easy and sophisticated effectiveness were devised as a part of this analysis project to change comparative analysis of effectiveness between mediation contexts (contextual comparative analysis).

 (i) Simple Effectiveness

In this project, easy effectiveness refers to whether the associate agreement is reached at intervals of the mediation, and this seems to be the foremost oftentimes measured mediation outcome. For this analysis, potency indicators and measures, like timeliness and prices, are accepted as being qualifiers of settlement (e.g., wherever a settlement is achieved, was it achieved efficiently?), and square measure so enclosed in easy effectiveness. Simple effectiveness may be a case management data point, a typical against that the effectiveness of many mediation services and programs is measured and assessed. Even a perfunctory assessment of the broader mediation literature suggests that the main target on easy effectiveness could have influenced the planning of the many mediation programs and services.[17] therefore widespread is its application in analysis and apply, easy effectiveness may well be aforementioned to be associate “industry standard” for mediation across all dispute and mediation contexts.

A focus on easy effectiveness bypasses a lot of complicated analyses of what happens at intervals mediation, as the contributions and influences of the mediator.

(ii) Complicated Effectiveness : Complex Effectiveness includes the measuring of any, or a mix of any, mediation outcomes extra to the action of settlement, [18]including, however not restricted to, the following:

  • Participant satisfaction (accepted as incorporating factors that relate to perceptions of fairness),
  • Rates of compliance,
  • Nature of agreements, and
  • Improvement in participants’ post-dispute relationship

It may well be aforementioned that the on top of measures square measure every relevant to overall participant satisfaction and perceptions of fairness. during this Note, they’re noted put together as “fairness and satisfaction measures”. a number of the chosen studies used measures that square measure extra to, rather than being elements of, effectiveness; as an example, one program analysis report includes measures of effectiveness drawn from the ADR objectives outlined by the Australian Law Reform Commission in 1998.[19] wherever relevant, the extra measures square measure laid out in this analysis. Because of the character of its achievements, complicated effectiveness may well be aforementioned to attain broader resolution instead of slender settlement. Complex effectiveness has been aforementioned to supply a lot of sturdy agreements than easy effectiveness,[20] yet is a smaller amount seems to be thought-about than easy effectiveness within the assessment of mediation services and programs, and seems less oftentimes within the mediation literature as a part, or live of effectiveness. additionally, whereas mediators could play a job in achieving the result normal of easy effectiveness, their role in relevance complicated effectiveness is undiscovered.


(A) Minnu. B V. Prabhu Chandran

  1. It comes before the court as a writ petition bt Prabhu Chandran. Both the parties pending before the family court, Thiruvalla to family court, kottarakkara. During the belief of proceeding, the matter has been related to the mediation. And this matter must be settled between both parties. In the observed both the parties for the settlement arrived at the between the parties in the mediation, there is no necessity to transfer the cases, and the relief can be obtained based on mediation agreement from the court, Thiruvalla.
  2. Learned counsel for the petition also submitted that there are two parties. Appeals pending before a Division Bench Courts[21].
  3. In the view of the settlement arrived as between the parties in the mediation, But, there is no necessity to transfer the cases to the other court as prayed for in the petition.
  4. Both the parties must freely move to the family court, forgetting necessary order must be relevant terms of the settlement arrived between both the parties and family court.
  5. Family court is directed to the pass appropriate order based on mediation agreement entered into between the parties matters pending before the courts.
  6. Both the parties must liberty to move the division bench based on the mediation agreement for the disposal of the cases pending before the court.
  7. With the above direction and observation, these transfer petitions are disposed of. The office must be directed to communicate the copy of the mediation agreement settlement to the concerned court at the earliest.

(B) Sreelal V. Murali Menon  ( Kerala High Court)[22]

Normally, cases involving prosecution for criminal offenses don’t seem to be fit be remarked mediation (See Afcons Infrastructure restricted v. Cherian Varkey Constructions Company personal Limited: (2010) eight SCC 24). But, if the parties in a very case beneath Section 138 of the Act have an interest in referring the matter for mediation, it is often done just for the restricted purpose of inbound at a settlement concerning the number that the defendant shall pay to the litigant. On reaching such a settlement, once the report of mediation is received by the court, the litigant might withdraw the criticism or he might apply a change of integrity beneath Section 147 of the Act. The mediation agreement cannot be a part of the judgment or order of the court. The court cannot admit that agreement ANd pass an order within the nature of a decree authorization the parties to induce the number completed by filing an execution petition. The dictum arranged down by the Supreme Court in Govindankutty Menon (supra), concerning a bequest gone along the Lok Adalat is a very case beneath Section 138 of the Act, that is predicated on the deeming provision beneath Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act[23], doesn’t apply to a mediation agreement (See Sreelal v. Murali Menon: 2014 (3) KHC 316: 2014 (3) KLT 536).9. The dictum arranged down in Sreelal (supra) was followed by this Court in Shiyas v. Manoj Paul (ILR 2018 (2) Kerala 847).

(C) Govindankutty Menon V. Shaji

The impugned order has gone the learned official is ex facie felonious. The order has gone the learned official is sort of a decree in a very suit. The defendant within the case isn’t discharged or not guilty or guilty. The learned official has disposed of the criticism directional execution for the realization of the number in agreement to be paid within the mediation. the way within which the execution of the order must be created isn’t mentioned within the order. It seems that, whereas passing the impugned order, the learned official had in his mind the choice of the Supreme Court in Govindankutty Menon v. Shaji: (2012) a pair of SCC 51: AIR 2012 SC 719.8. Normally, cases involving prosecution for criminal offenses aren’t appropriate to be remarked mediation (See Afcons Infrastructure restricted v. Cherian Varkey Constructions Company non-public Limited: (2010) eight SCC 24). But, if the parties in a very case underneath Section 138 of the Act have an interest in referring the matter for mediation, it is often done just for the restricted purpose of incoming at a settlement concerning the number that the defendant shall pay to the litigant. On reaching such settlement, once the report of mediation is received by the court, the litigant could withdraw the criticism or he could apply a combination underneath Section 147 of the Act. The mediation agreement cannot kinda part of the judgment or order of the court. The court cannot trust that agreement ANd pass an order within the nature of a decree deputation the parties to urge the number realized by filing execution petition. The dictum ordered down by the Supreme Court in Govindankutty Menon (supra), with relation to a gift gone the Lok Adalat is a very case underneath Section 138 of the Act, that is predicated on the deeming provision underneath Section twenty-one of the Legal Services Authorities Act, doesn’t apply to a mediation agreement (See Sreelal v. Murali Menon: 2014 (3) KHC 316: 2014 (3) KLT 536).[24]


The current situation of the system of Alternative Dispute Resolution is getting mainstream for debate goal, it is being embraced by the family court in cases identified with marital questions, abusive behavior at home, and so on Area 9 of the Family Court Act 1984 permits intercession in family backing and Family Court to receive any sort of Alternative Dispute Resolution in debate goal successfully and helpfully. The cycle of Mediation is to impartial facilitator and aides both the gatherings through the interaction, the arbiter assists the gatherings with considering some fresh possibilities for the conceivable arrangement of questions.



[2] Madhu S, mediation in India at


[4] Held in the case of, “ Moti Ram (D) Tr. Lrs and Anr. Vs Ashok Kumar and Anr_(civil appeal no.1095 of 2008)”


[6] 2010 (8) SSC24

[7] S.L.P Civil no(s) 2896 of 2010

[8] Forbes India, Mediation in Indian Courts, available at

[9] Industiral dispute Act, 1947


[11] Section4 industrial dispute Act 1947


[13] 1. The Civil Pocedure Code, Section 89 reads, “Settlement of disputes outside the Court.- (1)Where it appears to the court that there exist elements of a settlement which may be acceptable to the parties, the court shall formulate the terms of settlement and give them to the parties for their observations and after receiving the observations of the parties, the court may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for

  1. a) arbitration;
  2. b) conciliation;
  3. c) judicial settlement including settlement through Lok Adalat



[17] For example, see: Laurence Boulle, Mediation Principles Process Practice (3rd Edition, LexisNexis Butterworths, Australia, 2011); Tania Sourdin, Alternative Dispute Resolution (5th Edition, Thomson Reuters, Australia, 2016).

[18] None of the selected literature investigated effectiveness that did not include the achievement of settlement.

[19] Australian Law Reform Commission, Rethinking the Federal Civil Litigation System (Issues Paper 20, Australian Law Reform Commission, 1998).

[20]  Jess K. Alberts, Brian L. Heisterkamp, and Robert M. McPhee, ‘Disputant Perceptions of and Satisfaction with a Community Mediation Program’ (2005) 16 The International Journal of Conflict Management 218; Kenneth Kressel et al, ‘The Settlement-Orientation vs the problem-Solving Style in Custody Mediation’ (1994) 50 Journal of Social Issues 67; Nina R. Meierding, ‘Does Mediation Work? A Survey of Long-Term Satisfaction and Durability Rates for Privately Mediated Agreements’ (1993) 11(2) Mediation Quarterly 157; Dean G. Pruitt et al ‘Long-Term Success in Mediation’ 17(3) Law and Behavior 313



[23] Legal Service Authority Act, 1987

[24]Sivarajan Petitioner/Complainant; vs. Suba

Leave a Comment