Posted on: November 7, 2020 Posted by: admin Comments: 0

Author : Tanisha Sarangi[1],  Student at School of Law, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar.

Co- Author :  Sagarika Rath[2], Student at School of Law, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar.


The EIA Draft 2020, is a controversial draft, whose public feedback was closed on 11th August, 2020. This article talks about the various reasons why this bill shouldn’t be passed. The reasons were derived from EROL as a global report. The ambiguity, uncertainty of interpretation, no clarity of role, no clear accountability, and various other reasons. The draft is in conflict with the Forest Dwellers( recognition of Forest Rights), 2006, the PESA Act, 1996. It goes against the rulings of National Green Tribunals. The fact that the Draft excludes the participation and feedback from public makes it an arbitrary action of the Government. The strategies made will be solely by the Government Authorities. The draft does not with its own Parent Act, I.e., The Environment Protection act and has numerous clauses which are whimsical in nature. The articles critically analyzes all the defaults it has and reasons why the draft should or should not be passed. The rights of the Forrest dwellers being affected with the erratic nature of such a draft. After analyzing the reasons such are the public feedback not being considered, the draft not being published in local languages to avoid any opposition, we came to a conclusion that the draft of 2020 would not be a feasible decision to make. It will run exhaustive of our resources and is not in interest of the Public welfare especially, the forest dwellers.

Keywords: EIA Draft, Violation, Rights, Environment.


Environment Impact Assessment or EIA can be defined as a study to predict the impact of a planned activity/project on the surroundings. a choice creating tool, EIA compares numerous alternatives for a project and seeks to spot the one that represents the simplest combination of economic and environmental prices and advantages.[3]

Environmental Impact Assessment or EIA is characterised as the examination to anticipate the impact of a planned movement/venture on the planet. A dynamic equipment, EIA worries completely different choices for a venture and appears to tell apart the one that speaks to the simplest mix of economic and natural expenses and benefits

EIA determines each the advantages and adverse effects of a precise project. It ensures that these effects square measure taken into thought throughout the project style. It helps to spot the attainable effects of the project to the surroundings and suggests ways that to alleviate them and even predicts if the measures planned have any adverse effects to the surroundings. By considering the natural impacts of the task and their relief from the beginning within the venture transcription cycle, ecological analysis has varied benefits, as an example, insurance of condition, ideal usage of assets and economical of your time and value of the endeavor. Properly conducted EIA additionally lessens conflicts by promoting community participation, informing call manufacturers, and serving to lay the bottom for environmentally sound comes. advantages of group action EIA are discovered altogether stages of a project, from exploration and designing, through construction, operations, decommissioning, and on the far side website closure.

Among the foremost departures from existing laws is that the removal of many activities from the horizon of public consultation. a listing of comes has been enclosed underneath class B2, expressly exempted from the necessity of associate EIA (Clause thirteen, sub cl. 11).

The comes underneath this class grasp seaward and coastal oil, gas, and sedimentary stone investigation, power comes up to 25 MW, water system divides a couple of,1000 and 10,000 hectares of order space, minuscule and medium mineral handling units, little foundries including chamber units, a few classes of re-moving factories, small and medium concrete plants, small clinker crushing units, acids separated from component or alkali, sulfuric corrosive, miniature, little and medium endeavors (MSMEs) in color and color intermediates, mass medications, counterfeit rubbers, medium-sized paint units, all inland stream comes, development or augmenting of parkways between 25 metric straight unit and 100 metric direct units with delineated boundaries, airborne ropeways in environmentally touchy territories, and given structure development and space advancement comes.[4]

There is dread that the exclusion from EIA and public discussion for recorded B2 class movement and development and improvement come can genuinely affect the environmental factors since these will be given out while not an oversight. Joined with a pristine arrangement for post-facto natural leeway (of comes dead while not past freedom), this may moreover debilitate assurances. Indeed, the notification time frame for the formal proceeding has been sliced from thirty days to twenty days. This may manufacture it extreme to check the draft EIA report, extra along these lines once it’s not wide reachable or given inside the territorial language.

The EIA Notification 2020 excludes reportage by the general public of violations and non-compliance. Instead, the govt can take consciousness of reports solely from the violator-promoter, government authority, Appraisal Committee or regulatory agency. Such comes will then be approved with conditions, together with correction of ecological harm, which, again, are going to be assessed associated report able by the violator (and not an unconnected agency), though Central Pollution electrical device tips should be used.


The Ministry of Environment, Forest, and environmental change (MoEFCC) released the Draft Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2020 on 23 March 2020, which has been strongly discussed. The arrangements and provisos of the draft raise contemplations over its absence of straightforwardness and the manner in which it discloses support fanciful and unimaginable. On the flip perspective, it conjointly vindicates post facto natural clearances in the midst of various hazardous arrangements.

Incredibly helpless execution and perception related to the frail capacity of the Pollution the executives Boards (PCBs) have debilitated the ecological standards. [5]

The present draft seeks to bypass the rulings of judicial bodies during a DE jure manner. There has been a compartmentalization of comes as A, B1 and B2 wherever massive numbers of comes were placed within the B2 class underneath that no approval or public hearing is needed. The B2 class was originally meant for atisanal which it discloses interest illusory and unthinkable. On the flip perspective, it conjointly vindicates post facto natural clearances in the midst of various risky arrangements.

Strategic comes should be subject to environmental appraisal and connected data ought to be within the property right. Post facto clearance, an obvious provision of the draft EIA 2020, goes against the rulings of the Supreme Court and also the National green tribunal (NGT).

 “The draft EIA 2020 violates the Environmental Protection Act, 1986, that pledges to shield and improve the setting. The new provision for thirty days for comments provides terribly less time for the folks to understand all the main points and type a collective opinion regarding the project. The draft doesn’t empower voters to file violations and non-compliance reports. voters and action teams have brought ninety nine.9 per cent of violation cases to authorities,” same faculty member Sucharita fractional monetary unit, Professor, statesman University, New Delhi. The provisions under the draft EIA notification, 2020, violate the constitutional rights warranted under Schedule V and VI, the regular Tribes and different ancient Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, (FRA) 2006, and also the Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA).

The new draft setting Impact Assessment (EIA) planned by the Union government has attracted flak from multiple quarters for ‘diluting the setting protection norms’. a bunch of setting activists and consultants operating with forest dwellers on August 11, 2020, sent a submission to the Union Ministry of setting, Forest and global climate change (MoEF&CC) against the draft. This has crystal rectifier to comes obtaining the ultimate stage II clearance, by citing accomplishment as a reason though they didn’t adjust to the FRA.

The report said:

The draft EIA notification 2020 can collapse to high variety of environmental clearances. this may adversely have an effect on the tenurial security of those communities provided in FRA. AN exponential increase within the classes of comes exempted from the EIA method would mean that forest housing communities, United Nations agency have insecure tenurial rights to start with, given the abysmal implementation of the FRA, are divested of a vital house to articulate their objections and considerations through the general public hearing method.[6]

However, many environmental activists have opposed this draft on the grounds that it’ll render EIA as a mere’s then fascinating to assess the Draft Notification through an environmental rule of law (EROL) framework developed by the United Nations environment Programme in its 2017 world Report[7]. The various defaults identified were:

  1. Unambiguous: A few terms in the Draft are not plainly characterized. A valid example is the qualification made between ‘rebelliousness’ and ‘infringement’ when there can be prospects of cover between these terms.
  2. Participation: Further, public support through interviews is searched after to be confined for {less than|for under} modernisation/extension accompanies under five hundredth expansion in capacity, with no defense.
  3. Accountability: Half-yearly consistence reports are move yearly reports that seriously impact answer-capacity.
  4. Clarification of role: Job clearness of offices commanded underneath the Draft becomes hazy once the capabilities of individuals from organizations like the master Appraisal Committee (EAC), State climate Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), and State master Appraisal Committee (‘SEAC) individuals are uniform. In the event that the organization of those specialists is indistinguishable, it’s muddled what the reason is for causing a progression to inter se.
  5. Problem solving Mechanism: At the point when it includes an open question goal system, the locus of the litigator has been seriously limited just if there should arise an occurrence of a complaint against an infringement/resistance.
  6. No scope for interpretation: The Draft comes up short on this part in like manner. The clarification for excluding a definite class of originates from the need of an EIA leaves heaps of room for misconception and disarray.

Ministry of Environment planned the draft of environmental notification had been extended for public critics and opinions and met with a colossal opposition and disagreements.With the times passing by, individuals became a lot of aware concerning the surroundings and tons of responses have start up.along side the large opposition, public has discerned numerous violence of rights and faults within the draft.There are numerous reasons for such negative approach towards the draft:

  1. The provisions within the draft are such, it’s lawfully unreasonable as a result of it doesn’t go along side the parent act- The Environmental Protection Act, 1986.This act takes numerous rules for the centre to form a stronger surroundings and work for the advance.however the new draft can cause numerous prejudicious to the surroundings.
  2. The draft contains such arrangements that are uncommonly stressing. the most thought process of the EIA Notification 2006, was to require safeguards and measures to relieve to require freedom before any development to allow an ex facto natural leeway to the hot started comes while not a freedom. Post Facto isn’t a substitution plan or perception. the govt., the courts, and in this manner the administrative get together have all permitted present facto on become the accepted see in the course of the most recent couple of years. The focal arrangement behind post facto is that if an individual puts monster amounts of money in crime, similar to the development of a shopping area, mining, industry, there’s an assumption that the ventures made were bonafide: with the aim to benefit the state as a full and for unselfish reason. there’s furthermore an assumption that the law was disrespected inferable from ‘ignorance’.The government’s perused is that making punitive move would create leaps in ‘simplicity of working together’; though for the Courts, such hot exercises are even by the light the need unfortunately, infringement of ecological law is viewed as ‘improvement”. Neither the Supreme Court nor the NGT (National Green Tribunal), nor the varied high courts have start up powerfully against post facto approval.
  3. There’s nothing concerning the amendment of climate and any connected discussions.It should the first and main motive to make sure the impact of such amendment as a result of Republic of India may be a vulnerable country.
  4. The draft violates the rights is that the authority of gram sabhas and tribals and undermines the environmental rights.the general public opinions is extraordinarily negative towards the’s reduced access to relevant data to the general public UN agency will be plagued by the comes.
  5. The draft has reduced time for appraisal from sixty days to forty five days below 2006 notification and has additionally curtailed the discretion of the committees by not permitting The draft of 2020 has completely no answer for the political and government officials fastness on the method.While comes regarding national defence and security are naturally thought of strategic, the govt.gets to choose on the “strategic” tag for different comes.The 2020 draft says no data on “such comes shall be placed within the public domain”.This opens a window for outline clearance for any project deemed strategic while not having to elucidate why.Additionally, the new draft exempts a protracted list of comes from public consultation.for instance, linear comes like roads and pipelines in border areas won’t need any public hearing.The ‘border area’ is outlined as “area falling at intervals one hundred kilometres aerial distance from the road of Actual management with bordering countries of Republic of India.” that will cowl a lot of of the Northeast, the repository of the country’s richest multifariousness.[8]

An EIA notification is issued below Section three of the surroundings Protection Act, 1986, to impose restrictions on putting in new comes or enlargement or improvement of existing comes.The section stipulates that such measures should profit the surroundings. In the April 1st order, the Supreme Court additionally said: “For Associate in Nursing action of the Central government to be treated as a live ascribable to Section three, it should satisfy the statutory demand of being necessary or expedient for the aim of protective and up the standard of the surroundings and preventing, dominant and subsiding surroundings pollution”.


The current draft EIA Notification conflicts with the idea of polluter pays standard, manageable climate and preparatory standards set up by the court. India is a social government assistance state as encapsulated in the Directive Principles of State Policy. It is very basic to find some kind of harmony between monetary turn of events and climate. It is imperative to take note of that despite the fact that it is a public enactment, it was just distributed in Hindi and English and in no other vernacular dialects. The Delhi High Court requested for interpreted duplicates of the draft in other booked dialects which has not been done at this point. This unmistakably bars nearby networks from public cooperation as they can’t record protests against something on the off chance that they can’t get it.

The announcing by people in general of infringement and rebelliousness has been rejected in the EIA 2020 notice. The legislature will rather take perception of reports just from the violator-advertiser, government authority, Appraisal Committee, or Regulatory Authority.

To summarize it, the new draft controls some way or another appear to say something minimal more in favor of advertisers or defenders of the undertaking, while at the same time striking down open discussions, tolerating defective and broken EIA reports coming about because of outer impacts, and disregarding the non-inexhaustible nature of assets.


[1] Tanisha Sarangi, BBA.LL.B, 2018-23, email: [email protected], School of Law, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar.

[2] Sagarika Rath, BBA.LLB, 2018-23, email: [email protected], School of Law, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar.

[3] Center for science and Environment, Understanding EIA,(Oct 1, 2020, 2.15 PM)

[4] Bibek Bhattacharya, EIA Draft 2020: What next for the controversial environment law?, LiveMint, (Oct 1, 2020, 3.30pm)

[5] Ishan Kukreti, EIA notification 2020 in violation of FRA: Activists write to MoEF&CC, DownToEarth (Oct 1, 2020, 4.30pm)


[6] id. At 3

[7] Shyama Kuriakose and Dhvani Mehta, Modi govt’s 2020 draft makes EIA a mere formality, fails on transparency, study shows, The Print (October 1, 2020, 6.15 PM)

[8] Shibani Ghosh, Draft EIA notification dilutes environmental protections, is in denial of ecological crises, The Indian Express (Oct 2, 2020, 6.30 PM)

Leave a Comment